CATEGORIZED | News

Abandonment takes critical planning, risk managment

Posted on 15 April 2010

Rigorous risk management and planning are vital to the successful, safe execution of complex well abandonment projects.

Speaking on day two of the IADC Well Control Europe 2010 conference & exhibition in Aberdeen, Martin Beveridge of Shell UK Exploration & Production told delegates that it is important to understand that integrity issues can be considerable, as proved to be the case with the Central North Sea well.

The well in question was originally drilled and completed in 1996. There were complications at the time that had to be taken account during the subsequent decommissioning of the well.

The well produced prolifically at the outset and was problem-free through to the early 2000s after which significant issues started to surface.  A workover was planned for 2006 but ultimately proved impossible to complete and led to a decision to suspend the well and plan for decommissioning … a task that turned out to be challenging.

Ultimately a safe and successful decommissioning was achieved and key to this was preparation — the considered drawing up of a clearly defined road map … thorough project definition, stakeholder engagement and modeling before moving into the execution phase.

“One of the good things in developing a road map for the successful delivery of well abandonment projects is to have a key project definition up front,” said Beveridge.

He said it was very important to scale a decommissioning project as they can range from single well abandonments to a full-scale field decommissioning and can demand very different project management skills, specialists and contractors.

“One of the key things about the risk management decision framework is that you look at the full domain of risks for the well abandonment, taking into account technical risks, key operational risks, commercial and regulatory and full domain of other risks that will lead to successful delivery,” said Mr Beveridge.

He strongly advocated scenario-based cost estimation and warned that, in the design of abandonment expenditure, conventional probabilistic cost modeling doesn’t really lend itself to this type of work.

It was necessary to cover the full bandwidth of possibilities, from straightforward to high complex and therefore expensive.

Mr Beveridge said this included contingencies such as relief well planning, emergency response and very complex well intervention strategies.

Turning to project governance, he said: “With this particular project we formed a steering group that acted as an intermediary between senior management decision-makers and the project team. This allowed us to capture the key project issues and discuss them on a regular basis.”

Regarding risk management tools normally applied in well engineering and completions and well intervention, Mr Beveridge said the team used the HAZOP and HAZID techniques, also carried out integrity reviews and safety cases and looked at defining ALARP criteria for carrying out the well intervention portfolio of work and ensuring that there was an emergency response fallback plan for relief well planning.

“These were important parts for the nature of this field/well abandonment project,” he added

Leave a Reply

*

FEATURED MICROSITES


Recent Drilling News

  • 27 March 2015

    Gravity-deployed carbon composite cable completes first commercial deployment offshore Norway

    Ziebel, a Stavanger-based provider of specialist well intervention services for the oil and gas industry, announced that its Z-Line gravity-deployed...

  • 27 March 2015

    Petronas’ INSTEP training institute plans improvements for integrated, experiential learning

    Institut Teknologi PETRONAS (INSTEP) takes realism seriously when it comes to experiential learning – seriously enough to be planning...

  • 26 March 2015

    Wood Mackenzie: Falling costs to soften blow of slashed exploration budgets

    Exploration budget cuts in 2015 will average 30%, but that will be matched by an approximately equal fall in exploration costs...

  • 25 March 2015

    C&J Energy Services merges with Nabors’ completion/production services

    C&J Energy Services, (C&J) and Nabors Industries (Nabors) announced the completion of the combination of C&J with Nabors’ completion...

  • 25 March 2015

    Douglas-Westwood: Oilfield services expenditure to decline by 30% in 2015

    Global oilfield services (OFS) markets are facing difficult headwinds as a function of commodity prices...

  • Read more news