Deloitte report shows a drop in North Sea deals, drilling

Posted on 18 July 2014

Oil and gas companies may be adopting a “wait-and-see” approach before making further investment decisions in the North Sea, according to a report published on 18 July by Deloitte’s Petroleum Services Group.

The report, which details drilling, licensing and deal activity across northwest Europe over Q2 2014, found a total of seven exploration and appraisal wells were drilled on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS). This is significantly fewer than the 12 wells drilled in the previous quarter and the 17 drilled in Q2 2013.

This drop may be the result of companies controlling costs and awaiting potential changes to the industry resulting from the Wood Review and the ongoing review of the North Sea fiscal regime, according to the report.

There were also fewer deals completed this quarter compared with the previous three months. A total of five deals were announced on the UKCS in Q2 2014, down from the 10 transactions reported in Q1. In addition, the report found there were seven deals fewer than the 12 registered during the equivalent period in 2013. There was no farm-ins reported in the last three months.

Derek Henderson, Senior Partner for Deloitte, said that the North Sea industry has been grappling with rising operating costs, which was having an impact on activity and investment decisions, particularly given the maturity of the region. “It’s no secret that the costs facing oil and gas firms on the UKCS have been a significant issue for some time now. Understandably, it tends to be more expensive to operate in mature fields, where oil is much more difficult to recover. Research suggests it’s now almost five times more expensive to extract a barrel of oil from the North Sea than it was in 2001.”

“What’s more, the drop we’ve seen in the number of farm-ins could indicate that companies are holding off before committing to longer-term exploration investments. Asset transactions, involving producing fields, remain at more consistent levels, which suggests companies are more confident in these types of deals, which can offer a quicker and less risky return,” Mr Henderson continued. “Notwithstanding this, there are a large number of assets on sale. However, vendors tend to be larger players, and as buyers are often smaller operators, with limited budget, this is creating an expectation gap in prices. Until there is movement on that front, deal activity is likely to remain muted.”

Meanwhile, the UK’s oil and gas industry is awaiting the implementation of recommendations made in Sir Ian Wood’s “UKCS Maximising Recovery Review,” which includes the introduction of a new regulator – the Oil and Gas Authority.

Combined with the review of the North Sea’s fiscal regime, which was announced in March’s UK budget, Mr Henderson said, oil and gas industry may be adopting a “wait-and-see” approach until there is a better understanding of all the these changes and their impact.

“There were many recommendations made in Sir Ian Wood’s final report, and it’s likely that the industry could be pausing until it has a better understanding of the impact of these, and the effect on the long-term future of the North Sea, before making any big investment decisions,” he said. “In addition, with the fiscal regime under review, it’s quite likely that the industry will be waiting until there is a bit more clarity over how this will take shape. The tax environment is a factor that bears heavily on the decisions of all oil and gas companies, especially with corporate tax rates that vary and can reach 81%.”

A recent Deloitte industry poll, which looked at the issues facing the UKCS and how the fiscal regime could be used to address these, indicated that 46% of oil and gas companies felt the overall level of tax most needed to be addressed.

This was followed by a more predictable and internationally competitive tax regime, which scored 27% and 15%, respectively. In addition, only 23% of respondents said they thought the current regime encouraged new entrants into the basin.

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Sudhir (Sam) Mishra Says:

    Sir Ian Woods recommendations on E&P and fiscal tax regime where taxes are so high that they outlive the very purpose of effective business engagements are some of the considerations that are responsible for hold ups.

    The cost benefit analysis and ROI in the light of prevailing international economical slump is making it even tougher for Companies.

Leave a Reply



Recent Drilling News

  • 21 October 2014

    IADC Cybersecurity Task Group to provide industry guidance to assess risks

    The oil and gas industry is not immune to cybersecurity threats, from computer viruses and malware to targeted attacks. The IADC Advanced Rig Technology (ART) Committee…

  • 21 October 2014

    Check-6 launches RIGOR digital checklist and compliance system

    Check-6 has launched RIGOR, a checklist-based mobile app to help simplify complex procedures and mitigate human error on the rig. Taking lessons from the aviation industry…

  • 21 October 2014

    Video: Next IADC Land Contract update to start in 2016

    The latest version of the IADC Land Contract was released in November 2013. Various incidents, including Macondo, delayed the release. “It’s an industry contract…

  • 21 October 2014

    Moomjian: ‘Honesty is the best policy in doing business’

    With more than 35 years in industry, Cary Moomjian, President of CAM OilServ Advisors, has seen the industry come a long way in terms of compliance and business ethics...

  • 21 October 2014

    Video: Companies prepare for EU Offshore Safety Directive compliance

    Earlier this year, Sir Ian Wood released a report on maximizing recovery from the UK Continental Shelf and recommended a new independent regulator to focus more on licensing…

  • Read more news