From the President: Principle above politics – Cuba, USA need a One Gulf strategy

Posted on 08 November 2010

Lee Hunt, IADC president, with Dagoberto Rodriguez Barrera, deputy minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MINREX), Cuba

Lee Hunt, IADC president, with Dagoberto Rodriguez Barrera, deputy minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MINREX), Cuba

IADC has a proud tradition of dedication to safety over its 70-year history. This unyielding focus reflects our belief that safety is the right thing to do. It is right for the rig, it is right for the industry, it is right for the world.

When the Macondo blowout occurred, IADC was on the front lines with the Joint Industry Task Force to develop recommendations to the US Department of the Interior, to help prevent such an event from happening again.

At the same time, the words and actions from the Administration in Washington might persuade a casual observer to conclude that safety is foremost in the minds of US national policymakers. Unfortunately, politics trumps sound policy when special interests are at stake. A glaring inconsistency exists that stymies the ability of industry to do the right thing in an environmentally sensitive emergent offshore drilling arena. I am talking about Cuba.

Cuba and the United States are embroiled in a 50-year-old embargo that prevents commerce or dialogue regarding E&P activity or virtually anything else. For most of that half-century, E&P operations offshore Cuba were essentially nonexistent.

Today, however, Cuba is moving to develop its deepwater resources in the eco-sensitive body of water dividing the two nations, the Gulf of Mexico. Reports indicate that as much as 20 billion barrels of reserves might lie in Cuba’s deepwater. A respected operator, Repsol, and an experienced drilling contractor, Saipem, will manage the initial operations using a drillship constructed in China and Singapore.

The companies plan to drill about 50 miles offshore the Florida Keys. Ironically, no drilling in US waters can occur within 125 miles of the Florida coast.

Despite the demonstrated competence of the operator and contractor, they nonetheless could benefit from equipment and services from the energy capital of the world – the US Gulf Coast. A mere two-hour flight away from the Cuban deepwater frontier exists an array of maintenance and service options – BOP and stack testing, remote-operated vehicles, cementing services, firefighting services, not to mention spill response, containment and cleanup resources.

This is not about commercial opportunity. Only seven wells are planned over 2011-2014. But it should not be about politics, either. Even the Environmental Defense Fund has acknowledged that US-Cuba cooperation is critical in keeping the Gulf safe.

Safety and common sense should rule the day. Why should credible and competent companies such as Repsol and Saipem be forced to search halfway around the world for critical products and services?

True, Washington has said that emergency licenses could be issued, should a major event occur. Our approach is to anticipate problems, not wait and react to emergencies. Safety must be proactive.

Drilling is a global pursuit. Our industry shares information readily, despite borders and barriers. The physics of well control know no boundaries. Nor should our concern for human safety and the environment.

Let’s put principle above politics and seek a One Gulf solution to deepwater GOM development, whether offshore the USA or Cuba.

Leave a Reply

*

FEATURED MICROSITES


Recent Drilling News

  • 27 March 2015

    Gravity-deployed carbon composite cable completes first commercial deployment offshore Norway

    Ziebel, a Stavanger-based provider of specialist well intervention services for the oil and gas industry, announced that its Z-Line gravity-deployed...

  • 27 March 2015

    Petronas’ INSTEP training institute plans improvements for integrated, experiential learning

    Institut Teknologi PETRONAS (INSTEP) takes realism seriously when it comes to experiential learning – seriously enough to be planning...

  • 26 March 2015

    Wood Mackenzie: Falling costs to soften blow of slashed exploration budgets

    Exploration budget cuts in 2015 will average 30%, but that will be matched by an approximately equal fall in exploration costs...

  • 25 March 2015

    C&J Energy Services merges with Nabors’ completion/production services

    C&J Energy Services, (C&J) and Nabors Industries (Nabors) announced the completion of the combination of C&J with Nabors’ completion...

  • 25 March 2015

    Douglas-Westwood: Oilfield services expenditure to decline by 30% in 2015

    Global oilfield services (OFS) markets are facing difficult headwinds as a function of commodity prices...

  • Read more news