CATEGORIZED | News

Norwegian NGO: Companies must take environmental responsibility

Posted on 14 May 2009

“Having been invited (to this conference) – and I must admit that I have wondered why we were invited – you should not be surprised by my answer from an environmental point of view as to whether drilling should be allowed in sensitive areas,” said Ms Sandanger.

 The Norwegian NGO Future in Our Hands reiterated its opposition to drilling in sensitive parts of the Norwegian Continental Shelf during the Environmental Conference.

Turning to statistics, she warned of the rapid increase in CO2 emissions. Also, changing temperature patterns are making a dramatic impact, not least in the North – where the prediction is for an ice-free Arctic by 2100, thus creating new routes for ships.

“This is something that oil companies are very pleased about,” she said. “Russian companies and maybe Norwegian companies are thinking about where they can explore for oil even further north.”

Homing in on the end of April, when the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy allocated 21 new production licenses to 34 companies in its 20th licensing round on the Norwegian shelf – which the industry branded “disappointing” – Ms Sandanger was critical of its reaction that prospective waters in the Jan Mayen area had been excluded.

The 21 licenses include nine new licenses in the Barents Sea and 12 new licenses in the Norwegian Sea but not that sector.

“When the plan was rejected, the Norwegian Oil Industries Association wrote a press release indicating that the government was more interested in preservation rather than balancing business interests with conservation,” she said.

“Balancing nature and business interests sounds very good, but I somehow suspect that it means they want to continue business as usual.”

Ms Sandanger said she believed the industry was interested in environmental issues and that it was good that drilling companies are prepared to take responsibility for what they do.

“You’re probably very aware of the very large difference in regulation between Norway and other parts of the world like Africa and Latin-America. Where good regulations lack, you have a very large responsibility.

“The lack of good governance also leads to a lack of performance … the lack of good regulation means you as companies should take that responsibility.”

She said too that the way in which the sector plans for worst-case scenarios is admirable.

“Planning for worst-case scenarios can lead to the creation of the best standards; that in turn means the best regulations, and that is the only kind that we should accept … our standards.”

And yet Ms Sandanger was implacable about petroleum exploration in sensitive parts of the Norwegian Continental Shelf. “Our answer to drilling in sensitive areas is no in places like Lofoten.”

Leave a Reply

*

FEATURED MICROSITES


Recent Drilling News

  • 15 April 2015

    DNV unveils Recommended Practice to standardize steel forgings for subsea applications

    Steel forgings are important building blocks for subsea components and are often tailored to meet end-users’ specific requirements. This results in long delivery times...

  • 14 April 2015

    BSEE issues proposed BOP, well control regulations for public comment

    On 13 April, US Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell announced proposed regulations that call for more...

  • 14 April 2015

    Wood Mackenzie: Deeper cuts may be needed to achieve cash flow neutrality

    The rapid and aggressive response by oil and gas companies to low oil prices has stabilized the sector...

  • 13 April 2015

    UKOG completes Weald Basin PEDL126 acquisition from Magellan

    UK Oil and Gas now holds 100% interest in the Weald Basin onshore license PEDL126 after acquiring...

  • 13 April 2015

    Noble Energy to drill Humpback, Rhea offshore Falkland Islands this year

    Noble Energy has acquired a 75% interest and operatorship of the PL001 license in the North Falkland Basin from...

  • Read more news